How to develop a successful solution
Diverse problem-solvers from snakebite and other fields are needed to design impactful technological, social, logistical, and systems-level solutions.
Entries need to be submitted by 12pm noon UTC 16 September 2026.
During the entry period, we are offering resources to help you curate your solution and build your team:
Find collaborators using our match-making platform.
Join SnakeHacks to identify innovative avenues for your entry.
Gain insights from snakebite experts in our webinar series.
We’re calling for innovations that improve outcomes for people affected by snakebite, through stronger community responses and faster, equitable access to quality medical care.
We need practical, diverse solutions – not just high-tech apps, but improvements in logistics, community trust, first aid, and referral systems.
Innovations are needed across the patient journey in order to support better community responses, help people receive appropriate care faster, diagnose and assess the type of care they need, and improve the quality of medical care snakebite patients receive.
Opportunities across the snakebite patient journey:
The prize seeks to improve outcomes for people affected by snakebite by incentivising innovative approaches to overcoming challenges in the patient journey.
First aid response
Assessment & diagnosis
Access & logistics
Emergency & supportive care
Solutions may be hyperlocal and focused on a single community, while others may be national, regional, or global.
Innovators will be required to justify their chosen level of reach, explain why that selection maximises impact, and share their plans for further scaling their solution.
Solutions should be centred on and informed by the end users to meaningfully contribute towards improving outcomes for people affected by snakebite.
End users could include patients, affected communities, first responders, traditional healers, and frontline health workers.
To ensure lasting impact, solutions should be culturally resonant and accompanied by a credible plan for long-term sustainability.
Throughout the finalist development phase, teams must incorporate research, validation, or monitoring and evaluation elements appropriate to their stage of development, to measure their impact on the long-run.
Potential solutions within the snakebite patient journey:
Please note that the list below is by no means comprehensive. They seek to illustrate some types of solutions that can be applied at different stages of the patient journey. These illustrative examples have been trialed with varying levels of success globally; they are included here to spark ideas, not to serve as pre-validated or preferred approaches.
Response preparedness
Improving capacity to respond to bites when they happen.
Integrating traditional healers: Establishing collaborative referral networks with traditional healers so they manage non-venomous bites with safe remedies, while directing venomous cases to medical facilities.
Community education: Training community champions to deliver clear, practical guidance on what to do after a bite.
Antivenom banks and cost-sharing: Creating community-organised funds or regional pools to purchase and locally store antivenom, mitigating the catastrophic out-of-pocket costs that often deter people affected by snakebite from seeking care.
Field snakebite kits: Equipping communities or field nurses with emergency kits containing splints, EpiPens, manual resuscitators, and snake ID guides to stabilise patients before transport.
24/7 digital hotlines: Establishing dedicated digital lines to advise people bitten by snakes on proper immediate actions and direct them to the nearest properly stocked health facility.
Safe transport training: Training first responders and paramedics in safe positioning during transport, including lateral positioning when needed to reduce aspiration risk.
Digital training: Such as smartphone apps that provide training and education on snakebite first aid.
First aid
Immediate and correct response by the bite victim or those around them.
Pressure pad immobilisation: Simple pressure pads or smart bandages bound directly over the bite wound to delay venom spread during transit, offering a safer, evidence-based alternative to harmful traditional practices like tourniquets or cutting the wound.
Drug delivery platforms: Methods to improve the delivery of drugs to the body, including microneedle patches designed for early, field-based treatment of snakebite envenoming, with the aim of delivering supportive or venom-inhibiting drugs rapidly before hospital care.
Access & logistics
Getting people bitten to appropriate emergency medical care, or bringing appropriate care closer.
Motorcycle ambulances: Using trained volunteer riders to transport patients from remote areas to healthcare facilities, paired with the development and testing of a novel delivery programme with robust monitoring and evaluation.
Drone delivery networks: Partnering with autonomous delivery services to centralise antivenom inventory and deliver it on-demand to remote clinics, reducing waste and expanding where treatment can be effectively offered.
Cold-chain transport tools: Using mini chillers that ensure antivenoms are stored at optimal temperature to ensure safe transport to remote areas.
Mobile clinics: Extending access to assessment and early treatment in underserved areas.
Transport unions and commercial buses: Creating evidence-based social arrangements with local transport providers to offer free or prioritised transport to health facilities for snakebite emergencies.
Digital apps: Developing smartphone apps designed to call motorcycle-based ambulances or other transport options.
Predictive supply matching and rapid-dispatch logistics: Utilising predictive analytics software to forecast snakebite "hotspots" based on seasonal weather patterns and snake migration data to pre-position antivenom stock at strategic regional hubs before surges occur.
Assessment & diagnosis
Understanding patient needs and the treatment required.
Point-of-care tests: Using rapid bedside or in-field tools to detect venom and distinguish envenoming from dry bites, supporting immediate treatment decisions and preventing antivenom waste and anaphylaxis risk. Examples include lateral flow tests and blood clotting tests.
Clinical diagnosis support: Tools that help diagnose snakebite patients based on clinical information rather than direct toxin detection. Clinical information includes patient histories (such as circumstances of the bite) and physical examinations. Examples include decision support systems that help formulate treatment plans and vital sign monitoring devices.
Snake identification tools: Using non-patient tools, including AI photo-based apps, to identify the biting species and inform management.
Imaging tools: Utilising simple, low-cost imaging (e.g., infrared thermal imaging) to assess tissue damage and determine the severity of envenoming, guiding decisions on hospital admission, antivenom dosing, and follow-up.
Emergency care
Immediate pain management and resuscitation, antivenom application, and management of adverse reactions.
Digital treatment support: Apps and digital protocols that guide facility staff through emergency snakebite management, including treatment steps, monitoring, and escalation.
Telemedicine and expert teleconsultation: Creating dedicated networks (e.g., structured WhatsApp groups) allowing rural clinicians to consult with toxinologists in real-time regarding diagnosis, antivenom dosing, and complication management.
Virtual reality telepresence: Utilising eyeglass cameras to allow remote experts to visually evaluate a patient's condition and guide local providers through emergency procedures in the field.
Airway and respiratory support: Tools and systems for bag-mask ventilation, oxygen delivery, intubation, and mechanical ventilation in neurotoxic envenoming.
Decentralised care models: Training non-physician personnel (like paramedics or community health nurses) to safely administer antivenom in indigenous or primary care health posts.
Supportive care
Promoting recovery by treating shock, kidney failure, respiratory distress, bleeding, paralysis, wounds, etc.
Wound care: Interventions addressing local tissue damage caused by snakebites. Examples include debridement tools to remove non-viable tissue, dressings for snakebite wounds, topical treatments, laser therapies, and adapting protocols from other chronic wound or skin disease programmes.
Dedicated snakebite units: Creating specialised spaces within district hospitals, similar to stroke or coronary care units, equipped with specifically trained staff to centralise expertise for acute complications like kidney failure or bleeding.
Our judging criteria:
Entries are evaluated by independent Technical Assessors and our international Judging Panel across 6 core criteria.
Note that weightings differ across tracks; see below for weightings.
Teams and solutions must meet our eligibility criteria.
The judging panel will use a portfolio approach to balance the overall diversity of solution types, patient journey focus areas, and geographic representation.
1. Impact
Launch: 25% | Growth: 30%
We define 'impact' as a measurable improvement in patient outcomes for snakebite patients – reducing mortality and/or morbidity through more accessible, faster, and safer care along the patient journey.
2. Innovation & contribution to the field
Launch: 30% | Growth: 20%
We define 'innovation and contribution to the field' as what is original about the solution's approach and how it advances the snakebite field. Innovation could include novel, combined, or adapted interventions – whether a new process, cutting-edge technology, service or approach.
3. Implementation pathway & sustainability
Launch: 10% | Growth: 15%
We define 'implementation pathway and sustainability' as a solution's credible plan for how it will be delivered, funded, and adopted in high-burden settings – beyond the prize period.
4. Understanding of the end user
Both Tracks: 15%
We define 'understanding of the end user' as a solution's demonstrated knowledge of the needs, realities, and constraints of the people it aims to serve – and how these determine the design and development of the solution.
5. Team capability & project delivery
Both Tracks: 20%
We define 'team capability and project delivery' as the team's demonstrated ability to deliver their proposed solution through relevant expertise, strategic partnerships, and a realistic plan to meet proposed outcomes within the timeline.
6. Safety & Ethics
Both Tracks: Pass/Fail
The team should show they understand any risks associated with their solution and are committed to doing no harm when testing and implementing their solution.
Use your expertise to develop a practical solution to address the key barriers preventing someone from accessing lifesaving care for snakebite.
Challenge prizes support open innovation for diverse problem-solvers, enabling the most promising ideas to progress with funding and expert capacity-building support. We welcome those closest to the problem—rural health workers, community leaders, and people with first-hand experience of snakebite—who are already finding ways to respond but need support to scale their novel and practical approaches.
The Wellcome Snakebite Innovation Prize is awarding £6.25 million to support the most impactful solutions.